Friday, February 13, 2009
Articles
I learned some about shutter speed from the indoor photography and night shooting articles, but it seemed rather redundant. The knowledge of ISO i gained from the articles was new and useful though. I feel that many of our ROT shots could be just as good as the pictures from the online classes assignment, and could all be much better with a few moments in Photoshop. It seems like many of the shots I saw online had all been modified at least slightly. I was interested by the 100 meter long picture, and thought it was an excellent example of a superb way to put something together with pictures. I thought he should have made sure the repeated cranes were unnoticeable to give it more of a continuous feel.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Who posted this? (I am guessing Chris. Am I right?)
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that many of our classes' ROT shots were just as good! However, I am not sure that I agree with you that they were altered. I also do not think putting ours in Photoshop would help. The eye here is what were are trying to improve on, not our editing skills.
Also, I appreciate your opinion on the 100m photo, but disagree with thinking it would be better by taking out the repeated object. Personally, I like the reminder that he was in the same spot; it was the people that changed, not the place. That, to me, was important. It is good to hear so many perspectives on this. It's great how an artist can affect us, the viewers, in so many different ways with one piece of art.
Nah that was Joe
ReplyDelete